A Reusable Knowledge Base Is Redefining What Makes an SEO Agency Valuable
The Founder of Holistic SEO & Digital argues that AI has made deep experience cheap and genuine uniqueness the asset worth paying for.

Since everybody is using these technologies in a similar way, the difference comes from how you structure it.
If this caught your attention, that’s not accidental.
The best editorial systems don’t happen by accident. Outlever builds them.

For years, an agency's pitch rested on the résumés behind it: the years someone spent at a big platform, the campaigns they'd shipped. AI has knocked the value out of that story. When a well-configured system can hand a three-month hire the output of a five-year veteran, tenure stops being the thing a client is buying. What's left to sell is whatever the machines can't copy, and the agencies adjusting fastest are rebuilding themselves around that scarce ingredient rather than around headcount.
Koray Tuğberk Gübür is the Founder of Holistic SEO & Digital, a coding-and-marketing agency that has worked with more than 200 companies across Europe, Africa, and North America and built a following around his topical authority and semantic SEO frameworks. He has spent the last six years recording nearly every client call and folding those recordings, alongside his SOPs and case studies, into a central knowledge base his team trains on. That archive is what lets him make a claim most agency owners would find uncomfortable.
His argument is that the knowledge base collapses the gap between novice and expert. "Even with three months of experience, you can do the work of someone with five years, because with the right SOPs, knowledge base, patterns and guidelines you can handle complex things," says Gübür. "You don't have to know every detail as before." That collapse has reshaped who he hires and what the agency does for a living.
From editorial shop to developer floor
Holistic SEO & Digital has shifted from editorial staff toward developers who orchestrate agents through the firm's guidelines and frameworks, and the heavy lifting that used to define an SEO build has largely been automated. "Server configuration, backend architecture and front-end design used to take nearly six months," says Gübür. "Now with certain templates we can create any site in one day," with semantic HTML, ARIA labels, and reusable component hierarchies across everything from ecommerce to local SEO. Much of that work now runs through the kind of orchestrated agent systems that used to demand a full technical team.
The developers still matter, he says, but not for the reason they once did. Their value is creative, tuning how the agents produce work rather than writing the code themselves. "Developers on our end are becoming more important, not for coding, but for using their creativity to make the agents do the work in a better way," says Gübür. Communication has become its own skill set, split across people who manage clients, people who direct agents, and the agents talking to each other, and it's the human judgment and taste around the system he's optimizing for.
The case for hiring green
That reordering pushed Gübür toward junior talent, the opposite of the industry's usual instinct to trade on senior names. Fresh recruits go through a six-week program and come out running the agent stack, while veterans, he finds, arrive with habits that get in the way. "If I hire somebody with ten years of experience, it gets harder to train them, because I have to change their ideas and opinions," says Gübür. "If I have somebody fresh, I train them, put them in the program, and they start using the agents as they should." Many senior hires, he adds, resist automation because they fear being replaced by it.
The trust signal has flipped too. Where an agency once leaned on a marquee hire's decade at a big brand, Gübür says clients now ask for the machine. "They even prefer a Koray bot rather than Bob or Cindy," says Gübür, describing clients who would rather query an agent built on his framework than hire someone with six years of experience elsewhere. The appeal is partly practical. "The agent doesn't sleep and it answers instantly," he says, and when it works, clients use it more, not less.
Uniqueness as the moat
If everyone holds the same powerful tools, Gübür argues, the edge moves to whoever configures them into something distinct. "Since everybody is using these technologies in a similar way, the difference comes from how you structure it," says Gübür. His prescription is technical: unique embeddings and entity relationships, plus a deliberately reinforced link graph, the kind of fingerprint that gives a retrieval system a reason to pick one page over a near-identical rival when it's deciding what's worth surfacing in AI answers.
He points to sites spun up by popular AI builders as the cautionary case. "When I check websites created with Lovable, I haven't seen almost a single one ranking properly," says Gübür, crediting the tool's visual polish while arguing that search systems spot the AI signatures in the code and design. His read of Google's own guidance is that signals of human effort register as quality, which is why he treats a recognizable, authentic style as an asset rather than an afterthought, and why he's wary of the cheap AI-built sites filling the web with interchangeable output.
Where the money moves next
The same logic shapes where Gübür is investing. Rather than selling retainers, the agency now ships tools clients can't easily walk away from, like WordPress plugins and calculators tailored to a niche. "For a legal client you build a settlement value calculator or a will generator, and they don't want to leave, because if they leave they lose all these tools at the same time," says Gübür. Packaged through marketplaces like Vendasta, those products double as new revenue lines rather than one-off deliverables, part of how agentic tooling reshapes marketing work on the agency side.
His next bet points away from digital entirely. Software for online marketing is too easy to clone, he says, so the real openings are in physical industries with millions of underserved operators. "I wouldn't build a SaaS for digital work, it's very easy to imitate and the competition is high," says Gübür. "But if you solve problems for hospitals, factories or restaurants, you won't have as much competition." The buyers differ in a way he's learned to price around: enterprises carry the HIPPO problem, the highest-paid person's opinion, and move like governments, while small businesses decide fast but rarely have the resources to execute.
Don’t miss the next one.
Get our latest pieces in your inbox. Leave whenever you want.





